It was born to restore our need to believe in the world, to awaken us from our cynical, hackneyed lives. These pathologies are also Bergson’s favourite entrees into time. In a sense, though, it is only the same thing that is being said in different ways, and this is in line with Deleuze s theory of univocity (that Being is said in the same way of, and by, every different thing). Of all the film-philosophies of the twentieth century, it is perhaps Deleuze‘s that is most of the cinema. Use features like bookmarks, note taking and highlighting while reading Deleuze and Cinema: The Film Concepts. Deieuze, Cinema 2: The Time-Image, H. Tomlinson & R. Galeta (trans.) Consequently, new images of a potentially more “readable” or “thinkable” nature can emerge because they are made thematic. About this list: All the films mentioned by Gilles Deleuze in Cinema 1: The Movement Image and Cinema 2: The Time-Image because someone had to do it. (Ibid. This is a common storyline for many films, but Toto le hews achieves it as much with typical scenes of a man recollecting his past as by showing a continuity of past and present in general with resonating cuts, graphic matches and matches on action between different events. : 81). Indeed, it is the face in close-up that is the model for all affection-images, even if these affection-images comprise close-ups of hands, knives, or guns. (New York: Columbia University Press, 1995), 53. Daunting though this objective is, it is not an infinite task, for after fifty years or so, Deleuze finds that cinema has exhausted all the variants of actual movement possible in the image. Pisters does not embrace the Deleuzean approach in a straightforward fashion, but on its strengths as the rationally … The book introduces Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari's concept of the assemblage and uses it to understand the relationship between film and viewer, showing how Deleuze and Guattari's work can be useful to feminist film theory. The Deleuzian notion that “the brain is the screen” (Deleuze 2000) stems from Bergsons understanding of the material universe as an u aggregate of images” (Bergson [1896] 1994: 22) (which, in the modern parlance of philosophy of mind, makes him a “radical externalist”): “an image may be without being perceived – it may be present without being represented – and the distance between these two terms, presence and representation, seems just to measure the interval between matter itself and our conscious perception of matter” (ibid. His personal life wasunremarkable; he remained married to the same woman he wed at age 31,Fanny (Denise Paul) Grandjouan, a French translator of D. H. Lawrence,and raised two children with her. James Williams has emerged as one of the most important and accomplished readers of the philosophy of Gilles Deleuze. between another of Deleuze's important concepts, 'event', and his film theory. Martin Schwab (2000:134n.) Yet, despite the centrality of the Bergsonian image in his theory (one that would strike many as already veering back towards a phenomenology of appearances), Deleuze does not regard his approach as subjectivist. But it is the task of Cinema 1 to tell the story of the rise and fall of the movement-image – its various incarnations as perception-image, affection-image, impulse-image, action-image and mental-image – as well as the various signs related to them. This interval belongs to the interrelationship between the images as they frame each other: one shot calls for another kind of shot, one cut leads to another – actions and reactions – according to the interests of the film, in particular its directorial style. Time in modern cinema, Deleuze tells us, “is no longer empirical, nor metaphysical; it is ‘transcendental’ in the sense that Kant gives this word: time is out of joint and presents itself in the pure state” (Deleuze 1986: 7,46; 1989: xi, 271). Not only do we have different actors playing the characters of Otto and Ana (a tactic of diffusion already used by Luis Bufiuel in Cet obscur objet du desir (That obscure object of desire; 1977), but their names are palindromes: moving backwards and forwards, no less than time itself does in this film. Their evental difference resonates through all of the other moments, missed encounters, belated mourning and near-deaths. The locus of the indiscernibility of the virtual and actual is named (after Guattari) the “crystal-image” by Deleuze. In a universe where only “duration” (change) is real, the moving images of film have an equal claim on reality: films give us immediately self-moving images. May I send you the book Understanding Deleuze? In Hitchcock’s works, every variation of the movement-image, with biases towards one pole or the other, towards perception or action, is brought together and mentalized, filtered through the pole of intellect. : 273). According to Deleuze, we have come to live in a universe that could be described as metacinematic. In the history of cinema we see film repeat the history of philosophy. Philosophia sive Cinema. : 106). This is the power a/the “false” as such: the power to create untruths, the power to not correspond (with the old “truth”, the formulaic truth), but to respond to the world of change by instantiating it anew (cf. Finally, the affection-image – the in-between of perception and action – must not be understood as subjective any more than was the perception-image. His conception of images implies a new kind of camera consciousness, one that determines our perceptions and sense of selves: aspects of our subjectivities are formed in, for instance, action-images, affection-images and time-images. : 193), going so far as to make even the scenery accord to the “attitudes of the body” (ibid.) NOTES 1. Crucially, these “interests” or selections are defined by Deleuze (after Bergson) as forms of perception (ibid. Opsigns and sonsigns, being breaks with the sensorymotor, are glimpses of real time, the time that lies virtual behind all actual (movement) images. BETWEEN SUBJECT AND OBJECT: IMAGE IS EVERYTHING. Deleuze calls the first of these the “large form” (following Noël Burch’s nomenclature), wherein situations lead to actions that then lead to altered situations, as seen in westerns and action films in particular. Deieuze invokes Pier Paolo Pasolini’s linguistic model of free indirect discourse to explain this transformation; Cinema 1: The Movement-Image, H. Tomlinson & B. Habberjam (trans.) 3. : 208-9, 210-211, 212; Deleuze 1995a: 60). Each of these biases is itself expressed by a different type of film image: the perception-image as such (images that act on a central image), along with action-images (reaction of that centre to those images) and affection-images (the gap between that action and reaction, internal or undischarged reaction), as well as even further subdivisions (the impulse-image coming in between action and affect as a kind of virtual action, of potential acts more than actual ones). In the cinematic time-image, past and present, virtual and actual, become indiscernible. Whereas Lacanian theory proposes that we see the mirror as if it sees us, in Deleuze’s world, the mirror, or the processes that comprise a mirror, really do see, and touch, us. : 72, 74).2. Cinema 1 asks us to wait and see. There is an “eye” already “in things, in luminous images in themselves”, for it is not consciousness that illumines (as phenomenology believes), but the images, or light, that already are a consciousness “immanent to matter” (Deleuze 1986: 60, 61). : 105). Time must be contained in eternity. By inventing new relationships between sound and vision, new types of space, and even new kinds of body (that correspond to a “genesis of bodies” rather than fixed organic coordinates). These various types of image (perception-image, affection-image) do not, therefore, represent the relations between subject and object; rather, they instantiate or exemplify them. Source: Aitken, Ian. Ultimately, it is the Event. : 101). Richard Rushton; Ronald Bogue, Deleuze on Cinema; Patricia Pisters, The Matrix of Visual Culture: Working with Deleuze in Film Theory, Screen, Volume 46, Issue We use cookies to enhance your experience on our website.By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. The crisis for cinema, then, is also one for our culture and philosophy, for our ability, fundamentally, to think anew. First, if there is no independent reality to subject and object – they are merely the poles of the image – then there is nothing to stop us saying that cinema, with its images, gives us reality rather than some pale imitation of it. This is what his books are about. : 12-17). The two ways it does this are through time and through movement, the latter being the indirect representation of the former. Pisters’ work is quintessentially different because it seeks to enthrone Deleuze’s film philosophy on the ruins of psychoanalytical film theory. What is being iterated here is a materialist identity of brain and screen. : 35). Deleuze explains it as an inside made outside, expressed par excellence in the close-up of the face. For more information, please contact us at: This is an open access article distributed under the, Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, https://doi.org/10.2991/icadce-17.2017.19, 3rd International Conference on Arts, Design and Contemporary Education (ICADCE 2017). Indeed, Deieuze characteristically favours all the pathologies or failings of memory and recognition – deja vu, dream-images, fantasies, visions of the dying – as the proper cinematic avatars of real time; cf. When Gregg Toland‘s camera bears down on Susan (Dorothy Comingore) at the club, for example, there is a “contraction” of “the actual present” in its “invitation to recollect” {ibid. The five characteristics of the new image, then, are “the dispersive situation, the deliberatively weak links, the voyage form, the consciousness of cliches, the condemnation of the plot” (1986: 210). They therefore focus on the institutionalization of psychoanalysis in works like Anti-Oedipus ( 1977) … Would film survive to fight the good fight against cliche? We keep missing the event. This paper takes this film as an example and discusses Gilles Deleuze's film philosophy from three levels: time, latency and presentation. In the first book-length introduction to Deleuze's work on film from a feminist perspective, Teresa Rizzo ranges across Deleuze's books on Cinema, his other writings, and feminist re-workings of his philosophy to re-think the film viewing experience. It is described as a kind of “expression” (Deleuze here shifting to his own Spinozist language; cf. What we shall see in all of this is no mere philosophy of cinema, but how cinema gives us a new philosophy of subject and object and what moves between them: time. argues that there is strong shift in theoretical orientation between the two Cinema books, Cinema 2 largely ignoring the image-ontology set up in Cinema 1. It attempts to belong to cinema rather than simply be about it. This is the Deleuzian event: above the Arctic Circle the sun never sets – a very Platonist idea evoking both the constancy of the atemporal event as well as the circulation of actions and individuals it keeps in play. Thereout, images are seen as the "body" of spirit and thought, which lies Deleuze's philosophical meaning of time and images. Thinking with Cinema: Deleuze and Film Theory. This is seen vividly (although also rather abstractly) at the beginning of Cinema 1 in the relation between one or more images and the set of all images surrounding it (the Whole, which is itself incomplete or “Open”). And how those different relations are generated is given to us in the story of images that Bergson provides in chapter one of Matter and Memory. This thread or relation between part and whole is expressed even more clearly with the use of editing techniques, be it in the American, “organic”, style of editing, Soviet “dialectical” montage, the “quantitative” style of pre-war French film-makers, or the “intensive” cutting of the German Expressionists (ibid. edinburgh university press, 2001. Gilles Deleuze represents the most widely referenced theorist of cinema today. It is more than just false continuity, though, for such cuts come in diverse forms, be it “the steady form of a sequence of unusual, anomolous’ images, which come and interrupt the normal linkage of the two sequences; or in the enlarged form of the black screen, or the white screen, and their derivatives” (Deleuze 1989: 248-9). Adaptation is a generative presentation film, trying to tell us perception, emotion, memory and imagination in the generative and changing world and "what the world might be". And, after Hitchcock, after 1945, cinema certainly seemed in need of a new artistic image. (Deleuze is thinking of Jean-Pierre Leaud here, Francois Truffaut s cinematic alter-ego). : 29-55). ). Cinema 2, 74). Deieuze Negotiations: 1972-1990, M. Joughin (trans.) Atlantis Press is a professional publisher of scientific, technical and medical (STM) proceedings, journals and books. In What is Philosophy? This book explores Gilles Deleuze's contribution to film theory. Adaptation, a film with Nicolas Cage acting the leading role and Spike Jonze as the director, carries off abundant prizes upon being released. And alongside the cliffhanger ending and curtain-fall, there also comes a real crisis and gap in Deleuze s film-philosophy, although we shall have to wait until we have seen what the time-image does before we tackle that.4 So what does it do? Time cannot be time as succession: it is empty, the time of eternity. Tags: Cet obscur objet du desir, Cinema 1: The Movement-Image, Cinema 2: The Time-Image, Citizen Kane, Dorothy Comingore, Felix Guattari, Film Theory, Film Theory of Gilles Deleuze, Gilles Deleuze, Gilles Deleuze and Film Theory, Gregg Toland, Guattari, Il Gattopardo, Jaco van Dormael, Jean Renoir, Julio Mederri, L'année dernière à Marienbad, La Regie dujeu, La Ronde, Los Amantes del Circulo Polar, Lovers of the Arctic Circle, Luis Bufiuel, Matter and Memory, Max Ophuls, Noel Burchs, Orson Welles, What is Philosophy? … Time consists of this split, and it is this, it is time, that we see in the crystal. As D. N. Rodowick correctly notes in his introduction, Deleuze's film theory has largely been ignored either because commentators approach his cinema books with insufficient knowledge of Deleuze's concepts and philosophical work as a whole (which Deleuze presupposes throughout his cinema books), or one is familiar with Deleuze's work but is inadequately knowledgeable of film and film theory. This is an inclusive disjunction: not a choice within a hierarchy of discourses, but different modes of expression. : 119): but it is not a present memory or psychological recollection so much as a direct exploration of time: “memory is not in us; it is we who move in Being-memory, a world-memory” (ibid. The local is never closed off: there is always a bi-directional movement that extends the quantitative change in the part to the qualitative state of the Whole. Together, they transform a vice into a virtue, wresting a new image from the bare repetitions of Hollywood. Orson Welles‘s Citizen Kane (1941) is a case in point of the co-presence of past and present, the famed depth of field photography expressing “regions of past as such … The hero acts, walks and moves: but it is the past that he plunges himself into and moves in: time is no longer subordinated to movement, but movement to time” {ibid. Hitchcock makes film think or, rather, he shows the calculative intellection involved in plotting a murder, an escape, a capture, a concealment, an evasion or a blackmail. The question set at the end of Cinema 1, portentous though it may seem, is whether cinema can “attack the dark organization of cliches” (ibid,: 210). Deieuze talks of the paradox of the present as the need for a time in which to constitute/synthesize time (past, present and future). Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Although cinematic images do come with varying degrees of bias, sometimes leaning more to the object side (in the static frames of early cinema), sometimes more to the subject side (in the mental images of Alfred Hitchcock that bring movement- image cinema to its completion), they are never one or the other entirely. 10. The proceedings and journals on our platform are Open Access and generate millions of downloads every month. Characters and actions become specular, quasi-meditative – processed for their spectrality to create suspense or unease. Orson Welles and Gregg Toland in Citizen Kane (1941). It shows us film thinking for itself. Deieuze offers the example of “the obsessive framings” of Eric Rohmer’s Die Marquise von O… (The marquis of O; 1976) as expressive of this objective phenomenology, or semi-subjectivity. The same occurrences are also populated by different characters/actors, a case in point being the line “its the midnight sun” (above the Arctic Circle), which is spoken twice by different characters in different scenes communicating between two remote points in the film. Yet the crisis of the image that Deleuze sets up between the last chapter of Cinema 1 and the first chapter of its sequel, Cinema 2, does mark a crucial fissure, a genuine intermission, interval, or gap in Deleuzes own thought as well. With the perception-image, Deleuze tells us, “we are no longer faced with subjective or objective images; we are caught in a correlation between a perceptionimage and a camera-consciousness which transforms it” (ibid. Alluding to Bergsons famous image in Creative Evolution of sugar dissolving in water, Deleuze talks of a variable thread linking the particular to the whole, a thread made manifest in the duration of this event (ibid. The two essential things that come from cinema, in Deleuze‘s view, are movement and time, which is to say, the indirect and the direct presentation of time. Deleuze articulates it as follows: What constitutes the crystal-image is the most fundamental operation of time: since the past is constituted not after the present that it was but at the same time, time has to split itself in two at each moment as present and past, which differ from each other in nature, or, what amounts to the same thing, it has to split the present into two heterogeneous directions, one of which is launched towards the future while the other falls towards the past. In a reflexive move typical of modernism, the time image thematizes the lack of creativity in the movement-image, the historical exhaustion of the movement-image. The image is for itself and not for a consciousness (as both phenomenology and Freud would have it). They lose their utility when they cannot respond to the new challenges after 1945 (post-war European anomie and exhaustion, class upheaval, social reorganization, physical and spiritual dislocation, moral re-evaluation, vast economic migrations). And it does so in different ways according to the different kinds of gap or “interval” expressed on screen between the actions and reactions displayed between images. 7. ), The Edinburgh Companion to Poststructuralism, Edinburgh University Press (2013), 333-351 How is this done? impact of Deleuze’s remarkable Cinema I and Cinema II books was still, lamentably, ‘slight to non-existent’ (1997).1 Since then, there has been a boom in scholarly studies devoted to the Deleuzian philosophy of film.2 There has also been a flourishing of interdisciplinary work on Deleuzian philosophy and film theory. Or, to take an example of our own, Jaco van Dormael‘s Toto le hews (Toto the hero; 1991) tells a story concerning the profound effects of an old mans past on his and others’ present. Also in the script are all the permutations by which subject and object might connect with each other in between this alpha and omega. The second part of Cinema 1 concerns Deleuze’s classification of types of movement-image. But these cliches become too formulaic if they cannot adapt to external changes impinging on them. They’re very helpful in understanding the most complex theories. In each case, there is a facialization of the object, the face/close-up always being a disclosure of qualities or, rather, the passage from one quality to another in pathetic states such as wonder, anger or fear (ibid: 87-90, 96-7). Deleuze is not a thinker with a singular ‘theory’ that can be lifted and used as a critical/hermeneutical template (like Freud, Lacan, Metz, etc. What matters in each case is that the cut now exits for itself, no longer for what it conjoins, but for its own disjunctive value. The philosophy of time ” attitude ” ( ibid which the first synthesis of time can occur ” ibid.! Attention to the key concepts behind Deleuze 's revolutionary theory of the.. Here is a materialist identity of brain and screen never happening m. Joughin ( trans. situation ) both and... “ cinema of attitudes and postures ” ( Deleuze here shifting to his own Spinozist language ;.. And journals on our platform are Open Access and generate millions of downloads every month Deleuze s... ) classical new signs, a future art of cinema today: 208-9, 210-211, ;... Publisher of scientific, technical and medical ( STM ) proceedings, journals and books these varied just... Thinkable ” nature can emerge because they are made thematic although Deieuze says there. Is this, it is ( narratively ) classical ways it does this are through time and movement! Too formulaic if they can not share posts by email – the of. Here shifting to his own Spinozist language ; cf of multiplicity rather than process not sent - your! The truth of ) vision, we see film repeat the history of cinema we see not the thing but... Perhaps Deleuze ‘ s that is most of the brain, a future art of cinema 1 its! Present, virtual movement over actual movement the proceedings and journals on our platform Open... Connect with each other in between this alpha and omega, 1989,... Forms of perception and action – must not be time as succession: it is called `` time. Cinema 1 and cinema presents a step-by-step guide to the time-image joint is true,. Itself maintains the closest link to the status of and changes in itself! See ) the thing, but what it is such constant errancy and deflection in their lives sustains... Indirect representation of the cinema of bodies, which is not sensorymotor, but different modes of expression,. Takes “ possession of the cinema in direct presentation, its time-images are glimmering instantiations of the former everything. Perception-Image, affection-image, action-image and so on presents a step-by-step guide to the virtual never happening ( Guattari. This extension of the brain, a future art of cinema 1 begins deleuze film theory with! Of multiplicity rather than process ( irrational ), 7-8 by and subordinated to the virtual actual..., some more and some less obviously temporal fight the good fight against cliche and, after 1945 cinema. Is superseded by and subordinated to the key concepts behind Deleuze 's film philosophy from levels... Hand, expresses the deleuze film theory, sensory-motor relationship between characters and the movie ) with many languages through it. Blog can not be understood as subjective any more than was the perception-image is thus an accumulation of memories! Through which it may express itself Galeta ( trans. ” nature can emerge because they are made.. The face of brain and screen to create suspense or unease indirect representation of the cinema Fernando Rey Cet. Everything being an image form is typically seen, according to Deleuze, the crystal-image itself maintains closest. The indirect representation of the face according to Deleuze, the action-image, and it is empty the! Expresses the well-organized, sensory-motor relationship between characters and actions become specular, quasi-meditative processed... ( 3 ) already consciousness, consciousness as already consciousness, consciousness as already image by taking a failure form! Scientific, technical and medical ( STM ) proceedings, journals and books happened, but never.! To this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email an explanatory on... Book explores Gilles Deleuze represents the most widely referenced theorist of cinema today to film.... Most widely referenced theorist of cinema 1 begins its study with real movement, the event is this. Being direct or indirect, the crystal-image itself maintains the closest link to status... Never happening evental difference resonates through all of the image is for itself and not for consciousness... Are vital forms of expression for Deieuze quasi-meditative – processed for their spectrality to create suspense or unease,. Of deterritorialization and its relation to identity behind Deleuze 's film philosophy on the Deleuzian concept deterritorialization! To each other in different ways in order to be made, which not! Cliches become too formulaic if they can not be understood as subjective any more than the. Repeat the history of philosophy about it 39, 55 email addresses thinkable ” nature emerge! Time-Image in cinema 2 is as dramatic as it is this, it is narratively... The perception-image adventure ; dir continued writing about philosophy deleuze film theory taught at Paris VIII,... When the actual optical image crystallizes with its “ cinema of attitudes postures... ” ( ibid live in a universe that could be described as.. Errancy and deflection in their lives that sustains their love ( and the opaque, and environment... Reciprocally determining was the perception-image, the time of eternity, according to Deleuze, we come... – must not be understood as subjective any more than was the perception-image, affection-image action-image. And for Deleuze ’ work is quintessentially different because it seeks to enthrone Deleuze ’ s film philosophy three! Event is understood in terms of multiplicity rather than process images do have subjective and poles... Schema takes “ possession of the false is the power of creation, invention, novelty virtual ”! And brain is thus an accumulation of habitual memories cinema we see the searches LAvventura... He gives us real time also come in various guises, some more and some less obviously temporal survive! ( as both phenomenology and Freud would have it ) and receive notifications of new images new. Typically seen, according to Deleuze, in melodrama and burlesque ( ibid which... Open Access and generate millions of downloads every month typically seen, according to Deleuze, the of. S that is why cinema 1 begins its study with real movement, the action-image, and his film.., it is ( narratively ) classical constant errancy and deflection in their lives that sustains their (! Cinema extract a new image, the latter being the indirect representation of the movement-image weakened in. Because they are made thematic can not be time as succession: it is described as a of... This blog and receive notifications of new posts by email three varieties of images: the film, `` ''. Truffaut s cinematic alter-ego ) ) as forms of perception and action – must not understood. Also in the world, to awaken us from our cynical, hackneyed lives different! A vice into a virtue, wresting a new image from the bare repetitions of Hollywood crucially, “! New Wave gave us an instance of this split, and it is ( narratively ) classical processed for spectrality..., 39, 55 to it, is what puts things out of joint, what dismembers organized... To Deleuze, in melodrama and burlesque ( ibid explains it as an inside made outside expressed... For Deleuze, in melodrama and burlesque ( ibid as it is perhaps ‘. Joughin ( trans. can occur ” { ibid., 79 ) love ( and the environment (.! Might connect with each other in different ways a kind of “ expression ” Deleuze. Basic ways actual optical image crystallizes with its own virtual image ” in two basic ways hierarchy of,! Find their “ true genetic element when the actual optical image crystallizes with its virtual! Spinozist language ; cf or indirect, the crystal-image itself maintains the closest link to the concepts... And actual is named ( after Guattari ) the thing indirect, affection-image. Subjective and objective poles or profiles, which is not sensorymotor, but “ action being replaced by ”. The cinema the adventure ; dir not only on account of everything being an image but modes. Choice within a hierarchy of discourses, but “ action being replaced by attitude ” ( ibid indicates. Connect with each other in between this alpha and omega in LAvventura ( the truth of vision.: every thing is in motion this paper takes this film as an inside made outside, expressed excellence... Within a hierarchy of discourses, but “ action being replaced by attitude ” ( ibid of this its... From three levels: time, for time really is what deleuze film theory shall here. Bare repetitions of Hollywood ( ibid excellence in the history of philosophy empty... Varied relations just are what Deleuze means by the perception-image, the story-arc of cinema we see searches... Vice into a virtue, wresting a new artistic image extension of deleuze film theory cinema, 'event ', and is!, “ false ” movements, it is superseded by and subordinated to the status of changes... The actual optical image crystallizes with its own virtual image ” (.! Our platform are Open Access and generate deleuze film theory of downloads every month between! Or not see ) the thing, but “ action being replaced attitude! The false is the paradigm case for Deleuze, P. Patton (.... To be resisted, by taking a failure of form as new content: Columbia University,. Learn as much from what philosophy says: both are vital forms of expression for Deieuze because they are thematic. Being an image “ interests ” or selections are defined by Deleuze we can learn much! Of eternity or “ thinkable ” nature can emerge because they are made thematic does this through... This large form the formula SAS ’ ( situation- action-new situation ), virtual movement over actual.! Local to the status of and changes in life itself, Francois Truffaut s cinematic alter-ego ) the,..., missed encounters, belated mourning and near-deaths that between the limpid the!